World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 2 ( March-April, 2022 ) > List of Articles


Comparative Analysis of Retention and Bite Force in Completely Edentulous Patients with Torus Palatinus Restored with Two Different Denture Designs

Bindu Vaithilingam, Jayashree Mohan, Kamaraj Loganathan, Madhuniranjanswamy, Tina Varghese, Abin Varghese

Keywords : Bite force, Denture designs, Retention, Torus palatinus

Citation Information : Vaithilingam B, Mohan J, Loganathan K, M, Varghese T, Varghese A. Comparative Analysis of Retention and Bite Force in Completely Edentulous Patients with Torus Palatinus Restored with Two Different Denture Designs. World J Dent 2022; 13 (2):138-143.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1904

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 31-01-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Aim and objective: This study aimed to investigate the retention and bite force in completely edentulous patients with torus palatinus rehabilitated with two designs, one with window to accommodate the tori which is later modified to a horseshoe-shaped complete denture. Materials and methods: A total of 66 patients, with tori requiring complete denture, were included in the study. The retention was measured during 3 months follow-up with both designs. The denture bases with different designs were subjected for evaluation of retention using a Handheld Digital Push-Pull Force Gauge Meter to evaluate the retentive values of the denture bases. The bite force was measured at the first molar region by a custom-built occlusal force meter at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months intervals during follow-up. Results: The results of the study showed that there was not much significant difference between the two denture designs in terms of their retention. The mean biting force was statistically significant different between both the designs, with the horseshoe design showing higher values compared to the denture with window. Conclusion: Among the two designs, retention values were approximately the same with both the designs and there was a significant difference in bite force values with the horseshoe-shaped denture. Clinical significance: Some intraoral anatomical features can negatively affect certain patients and complicate prosthodontic intervention. In this study, the horse shoe-shaped complete denture proved to be an effective treatment option compared to the denture with the window.

  1. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94(1):10–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.001
  2. Edwards LF, Boucher CO. Anatomy of the mouth in relation to complete dentures J Am Dent Assoc 1942;29(3):331–345. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1942.0019
  3. Hardy IR, Kapur KK. Posterior border seal—its rationale and importance. J Prosthet Dent 1958;8(3):386–397. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913 (58)90064-7
  4. Jacobson TE, Krol AJ. A contemporary review of the factors involved in complete denture retention, stability, and support. Part I: retention. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49(1):5–15. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913 (83)90228-7
  5. Ali MSA, Al-Harbi FA. Posterior palatal seal area established in conventional and CAD/CAM fabricated complete denture techniques: clinical case study. J Dent Craniof Res 2016; 1;(1);3. DOI: 10.21767/2576-392X.100003
  6. Bouquot JE. Common oral lesions found during a mass screening examination. J Am Dent Assoc 1986;112(1):50–57. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1986.0007
  7. Jainkittivong A, Apinhasmit W, Swasdison S. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of oral tori in 1,520 Chulalongkorn University Dental School patients. Surg Radiol Anat 2007;29(2):125–131. DOI: 10.1007/s00276-007-0184-6
  8. Hiremath V.K. Husein A. Mishra N. Prevalence of torus palatinus and torus mandibularis among Malay population. J Int Soc Prev Commun Dent 2011;1(2):60–64. DOI: 10.4103/2231-0762.97704
  9. Preoteasa E, Preoteasa CT, Iosif L, et al. Denture and overdenture complications. In: Emerg Trends Oral Health Sci Dent. London: InTech; 2015. 195. Available from: [Last accessed o 2021 Oct 1]
  10. Al Quran FA, Al-Dwairi ZN. Torus palatinus and torus mandibularis in edentulous patients. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006 May;7(2):112–119. PMID: 16685302.
  11. García-García AS, Martínez-González JM, Gómez-Font R, et al. Current status of the torus palatinus and torus mandibularis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;15(2):e353–e360. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.15.e353
  12. Bhandari PP, Rathod P, Punga R, Torus mandibularis: excision and closure with cyanoacrylate tissue glue Int J Oral Care Res, 2016;4(2):134–138. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10051-0029
  13. Rajeev V, Arunachalam R. Innovative replication and recuperation of complex torus palatinus: a prosthodontic case report. World J Dent 2016;7(4):208–212. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1398
  14. Falatehan N, Anfelia G. Nonsurgical approach for torus palatinus management in full denture rehabilitation. Sci Dent J 2020;4:124–128. DOI: 10.4103/SDJ.SDJ_21_20
  15. Rezeki A, Koesmaningati H, Kusdhany LS. Reliability and validity of an Indonesian version of the patient's denture assessment (PDA): a self-assessment instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with complete dentures. J Int Dent Med Res 2017;10:449. Corpus ID: 121175187
  16. Abrams S, Hellen W. Fabrication of an overdenture covering a torus palatinus using a combination of denture base materials: a case report. Dent Today 2006 Apr;25(4):74–77. PMID: 16646508.
  17. Costello BJ, Betts NJ, Barber HD, et al. Preprosthetic surgery for the edentulous patients. Dent Clin North Am 1996 Jan;40(1):19-38. PMID: 8635621.
  18. Valentine DC. Conservative management of a pedunculated torus palatinus in an edentulous arch. Gen Dent 1983 May-Jun;31(3): 202-203. PMID: 6347804.
  19. Abrams S. A technique for using maxillary anterior soft-tissue undercuts in denture placement: a case report. J Can Dent Assoc 2002 May;68(5):301-304. PMID: 12019041.
  20. Limpuangthip N, Somkotra T, Arksornnukit M. Modified retention and stability criteria for complete denture wearers: a risk assessment tool for impaired masticatory ability and oral health-related quality of life. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:43–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.09.010
  21. Bakke M. Bite force and occlusion. Semin Orthod 2006;12:120–126. DOI: 10.1053/j.sodo.2006.01.005
  22. Fernandes CP, Glantz PJ, Svensson SA, et al. A novel sensor for bite force determinations. Dent Mater 2003;19:118–126. DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(02)00020-9
  23. Shala K, Tmava-Dragusha A, Dula L, et al. Evaluation of Maximum Bite Force in Patients with Complete Dentures. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2018 Mar 13;6(3):559-563. DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.141. PMID: 29610620; PMCID: PMC5874385.
  24. Turker SB, Sener ID, Ozkan YK. Satisfaction of the complete denture wearers related to various factors. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2009; 49(2):e126–e129. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2008.11.003
  25. Koc D, Dogan A, Bek B. Bite force and influential factors on bite force measurements: a literature review. Eur J Dent 2010 Apr;4(2):223-232. PMID: 20396457; PMCID: PMC2853825.
  26. Kumar L. Biomechanics and clinical implications of complete edentulous state. J Clin Gerontol Geriatr. 2014; 5:101–104. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcgg.2014.03.001
  27. Fløystrand F, Karlsen K, Saxegaard E, et al. Effects on retention of reducing the palatal coverage of complete maxillary dentures. Acta Odontol Scand 1986 Apr;44(2):77-83. DOI: 10.3109/00016358609041311. PMID: 3524095.
  28. Atkinson HF, Ralph WJ. Tooth loss and biting force in man. J Dent Res 1973; 52:225–228. DOI: 10.1177/00220345730520020701
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.