World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 5 ( September-October, 2021 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Analysis of Various Smile Parameters Using Digital Photography: An Observational Study

Sushma Ramaswamy, Nikita Rohilla, Tanuja T Sathe

Keywords : Dental midline, Facial midline, Gingival visibility, Gingival zenith, Smile arc

Citation Information : Ramaswamy S, Rohilla N, Sathe TT. Analysis of Various Smile Parameters Using Digital Photography: An Observational Study. World J Dent 2021; 12 (5):392-398.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1856

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 29-09-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim and objective: To assess the various smile parameters like smile arc, gingival visibility, dental and facial midlines, gingival zenith, the relation between the upper incisors and the lower lip using digital photography. Materials and methods: Using a convenient sampling technique a sample size of 120 (60 males and 60 females) was drawn. Both close-up and facial photographs were captured using DSLR [Single-lens reflex digital camera (NIKON)], Lens mount NIKON F mount (with AF contact). Smile arc, gingival visibility, dental and facial midlines, gingival zenith, the relation between the upper incisors and the lower lip were the parameters that were assessed in this study. Results: The mean age of the male participants was 21.97 and the mean age of female participants was 22.20. About 81.7% of the total study population had convex smile arc, 53.3% of participants had type II gingival visibility for a forced smile, whereas 52.5% had type II for a natural smile. About 64.2% of the subjects had right side deviation of the dental midline, in 21.7% of the subjects the dental midline coincided with the facial midline. In 81.7% of the participants, the gingival zenith followed the ideal pattern. In 78.3%, the smile arc slightly touched the upper anteriors. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, it can be concluded that the various smile parameters like smile arc, gingival visibility, dental and facial midline and gingival zenith assessed can be used to rehabilitate the smile of dentate patients, partially dentate, and/or can help rehabilitate an edentulous mouth. Clinical significance: Dental photography offers the dental professional an array of the possibility of visual reconstruction of the various stages of treatment. With digital photography as an aid, the dentists can design and correct the smile for the utmost satisfaction of the patients.


PDF Share
  1. Manjula WS, Sukumar MR, Kishore Kumar S, et al. Smile: a review. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2015;7(Suppl 1):S271–S275. DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.155951.
  2. Bhuvaneswaran M. Principles of smile design. J Conserv Dent 2010;13(4):225. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.73387.
  3. Manjunath SG, Ragavendra RT, Setty SK, et al. Photography in clinical dentistry-a review. Int J Dent Clin 2011;3(2):40–43.
  4. Liébart MF, Fouque-Deruelle C, Santini A, et al. Line and periodontium visibility. Period Practice Today 2004;1(1):17–25.
  5. Soares GP, Valentino GA, Lima DA, et al. Esthetic analysis of smile. Braz J Oral Sci 2007;6:1313–1319.
  6. Kokich VO, AsumanKiyak H, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J EsthetRestor Dent 1999;11(6):311–324. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00414.x.
  7. McLaren EA, Culp L. Smile analysis. J CosmetDent 2013;29(1):94–108.
  8. Davis NC. Smile design. Dent Clin N Am 2007;51(2):299–318. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2006.12.006.
  9. McLaren EA, Terry DA. Photography in dentistry. J Calif Dent Assoc 2001;29(10):735–742.
  10. Ackerman MB, Ackerman JL. Smile analysis and design in the digital era. J Clin Orthod 2002;36(4):221–236.
  11. Kaur G, Patnaik VV, Kaushal S. The anatomy of a smile. J Med Colle Chandigarh 2011;1(1):20–23.
  12. Câmara CA. Esthetics in orthodontics: six horizontal smile lines. Dent Press J Orthod 2010;15(1):118–131. DOI: 10.1590/S2176-94512010000100014.
  13. Tjan AH, Miller GD. Some esthetic factors in a smile. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51(1):24–28. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(84)80097-9.
  14. Zachrisson BU. Esthetic factors involved in anterior tooth display and the smile: vertical dimension. J Clin Orthod 1998;32:432–445.
  15. Ritter DE, Gandini Jr LG, Pinto Ados S, et al. Analysis of the smile photograph. World J Orthod 2006;7(3):279–285.
  16. Sapkota B, Srivastava S, Koju S, et al. Evaluation of smile line in natural and forced smile position: an institution-based study. Orthod J Nepal 2017;7(1):27–32. DOI: 10.3126/ojn.v7i1.18898.
  17. Kiran PS, Chander KS, Annapurna PD, et al. Examination and correlation of facial midline and skeletal midline to dental midline by photographic and radiographic anaylsis respectively. Indian J Dent Sci 2015;7(1):11–15.
  18. Hickey JC, Zarb GA, Bolender CL. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. St. Louis: CV Mosby Company; 1975. pp. 365–367.
  19. Beyer JW, Lindauer SJ. Evaluation of dental midline position. Semin Orthod 1998;4(3):146–152. DOI: 10.1016/s1073-8746(98)80016-9.
  20. Bidra AS, Uribe F, Taylor TD, et al. The relationship of facial anatomic landmarks with midlines of the face and mouth. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102(2):94–103. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60117-7.
  21. Dayakar MM, Shipilova A, Rekha M. Evaluation of smile esthetics by photographic assessment of the dento-labio-gingival complex. J Dent Alli Sci 2015;4(2):65. DOI: 10.4103/2277-4696.171515.
  22. Sharma V, Khandelwal M, Punia V. Correlation of facial to dental midline and maxillary to mandibular midline in karnataka population. Ann Essen Dentis 2011;3(1):20–24.
  23. Humagain M, Rokaya D, Srii R, et al. Gender based comparison of gingival zenith esthetics. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2016;54(2):148–152.
  24. Charruel S, Perez C, Foti B, et al. Gingival contour assessment: clinical parameters useful for esthetic diagnosis and treatment. J Clin Period 2008;79(5):795–801. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2008.070488.
  25. Mattos CM, Santana RB. A quantitative evaluation of the spatial displacement of the gingival zenith in the maxillary anterior dentition. J Periodontol 2008;79(10):1880–1885. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2008.080053.
  26. Kay HB. Esthetic considerations in the definitive periodontal prosthetic management of the maxillary anterior segment. Int J Periodont Rest 1982;2(3):44–59.
  27. Goodlin R. Cosmetic dentistry-gingival aesthetics--a critical factor in smile design. Oral Health 2003;93(4):10–28.
  28. Meshramkar RD, Agarwal R, Pillai LK, et al. Study to evaluate some of the esthetics factors determining attractive smile. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2016;6(2):31–36. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1151.
  29. Rajtilak G, Deepa S, RajasekarV, et al. Anterior teeth and smile design: a prospective view. Int J Period Restorat Dent 2012;2(3):117–127.
  30. Lapatki BG, Baustert D, Schulte-Mönting J, et al. Lip-to-incisor relationship and postorthodontic long-term stability of cover-bite treatment. Angle Orthod 2006;76(6):942–949. DOI: 10.2319/090205-309.
  31. Sarver DM, Ackerman MB. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: part 1. Evolution of the concept and dynamic records for smile capture. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124(1):4–12. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00306-8.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.