World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 3 ( May-June, 2021 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

Giomer S-PRG Technology as an Alternative Restoration in Early Childhood Caries

Masayu Sesiliana, Eriska Riyanti

Keywords : Early childhood caries, Fluoride recharge, Fluoride release, Giomer, S-prereacted glass ionomer

Citation Information :

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1826

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-06-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: As a reference for restorative materials that can be used in early childhood caries (ECC) cases. Background: The term ECC is used to describe any form of caries in infants and preschool children. Treatment of ECC should be adjusted depending on the clinical condition of pediatric patients, which is to restore teeth function by restoring cavity and also to give esthetic aspect. Application of correct restorative material could prevent secondary caries and extensive damage to the tooth layer while maintaining primary teeth until exfoliation. Giomer is a real hybrid restorative material from glass ionomer and resin composites with fluoride-releasing and fluoride-recharging properties, with the main composition based on prereacted glass ionomer (PRG) technology. Case description: A 5-year-old boy accompanied by his mother to Dental Hospital Universitas Padjadjaran with a cavity on the right and left front upper teeth, absence of throbbing pain. Intraoral clinical examination showed caries on teeth 51, 52, 61, 62, 63, 64, 84, and composite fillings and secondary caries on teeth 74. The restoration was performed on the anterior teeth using giomer technology surface prereacted glass (S-PRG) material with different techniques (bulk-fill using strip crown, bulk-fill without using strip crown and layering). Pulpotomy treatment was lads performed on teeth 64, 74, and 84, then restored using bulk-fill giomer material. The restoration was evaluated for 1 month using modified USPHS criteria and assessments. The results showed Alfa (A) criteria for all teeth restored using giomer material. Conclusion: Based on the characteristics of the giomer S-PRG technology, this material can be considered as an alternative for restoration in cases of ECC. Clinical significance: Giomer S-PRG technology releases ions that can play a role in tooth mineralization, antibacterial activity, improvement of acid resistance, and prevention of bacterial adhesion.


PDF Share
  1. Kawashita Y, Kitamura M, Saito T. Early childhood caries. Int J Dent 2011. 1–7. DOI: 10.1155/2011/725320.
  2. Berkowitz RJ. Causes, treatment and prevention of early childhood caries: a microbiologic perspective. J Can Dent Assoc 2003;69(5):304–307b.
  3. McDonald R, Avery D, Dean JA. Dentistry for the Child Aa. Maryland Heights, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier; 2011. pp. 366–402.
  4. Council R. Policy on early childhood caries (ECC): classifications, consequences, and preventive strategies. Pediatr Dent 2017;39(6):59–61.
  5. Fajriani F, Handayani H. Penatalaksanaan early childhood caries management of early childhood caries. J Dentomaxillofacial Sci 2011;10(3):179. DOI: 10.15562/jdmfs.v10i3.281.
  6. Barceleiro M, Mello J, Mello G, et al. Hybrid layer thickness and morphology: the influence of cavity preparation with Er:YAG laser. Oper Dent 2005;30(3):304–310.
  7. Gordan VV, Mondragon E, Watson RE, et al. A clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and a giomer restorative material: results at eight years. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138(5):621–627. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0233.
  8. Sunico M, Shinkai K, Katoh Y. Two-year clinical performance of occlusal and cervical giomer restorations. Oper Dent 2005;30(3):282–289.
  9. Abdel-karim UM, El-Eraky M, Etman WM. Three-year clinical evaluation of two nano-hybrid giomer restorative composites. Tanta Dent J 2014;11(3):213–222. DOI: 10.1016/j.tdj.2014.10.004.
  10. Hajira NSWN, Meena N. GIOMER- the intelligent particle (new generation glass ionomer cement). Int J Dent Oral Heal 2016;2(4):1–5.
  11. Gallo J, Burgess J, Ripps A, et al. Three-year clinical evaluation of a compomer and a resin composite as class V filling materials. Oper Dent 2005;30(3):275–281.
  12. Zafar MS. Effects of surface pre-reacted glass particles on fluoride release of dental restorative materials. World Appl Sci J 2013;28(4):457–462.
  13. Naoum S, Ellakwa A, Martin F, et al. Fluoride release, recharge and mechanical property stability of various fluoride-containing resin composites. Oper Dent 2011;36(4):422–432. DOI: 10.2341/10-414-L.
  14. Suzuki N, Yoneda M. Antibacterial effect of surface pre-reacted glass ionomer filler and eluate–mini review. Pharm Anal Acta 2015;06(03):3–7. DOI: 10.4172/2153-2435.1000349.
  15. Fujimoto Y, Iwasa M, Murayama R, et al. Detection of ions released from S-PRG fillers and their modulation effect. Dent Mater J 2010;29(4):392–397. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2010-015.
  16. Lowe RA. Advances in composite resin materials. Inside Dent 2015;11(12):45–52.
  17. Yap AUJ, Pandya M, Toh WS. Depth of cure of contemporary bulk-fill resin-based composites. Dent Mater J 2016;35(3):503–510. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2015-402.
  18. Irwandana PW, Kristanti Y, Daradjati S. Perbedaan perubahan warna pada bahan restorasi giomer dan kompomer pasca aplikasi bahan bleaching berbahan dasar hidrogen peroksida 40% sebagai bahan in office bleaching. J Ked Gi 2016;7(2):145–150.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.