World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 3 ( May-June, 2021 ) > List of Articles


Clinicoradiographic Comparison of Carrier-based Obturation Technique and Lateral Compaction Obturation Technique

Sandeep S Reyal, Vijaya K Rajamani

Keywords : Endodontics, Obturation, Root canal therapy

Citation Information :

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1828

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-06-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Aim and objective: This in vivo longitudinal study aimed to do a comparative analysis of the efficacy of carrier-based obturation (CBO) technique and lateral compaction (LC) technique in patients undergoing root canal therapy. Materials and methods: A total of 40 patients scheduled to undergo root canal therapy were enrolled based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patients were assessed using periapical digital radiographs. All the patients were broadly divided into two study groups based on the type of obturation technique used as follows: Group I—patients in which CBO technique with Thermafill carriers (30/0.04) (Dentsply Maillefer) with EndoSequence BC Sealer (Brassler, USA) was used and group II—patients in which LC technique with 30, 0.02 taper GP cone (Dentsply Maillefer) with EndoSequence BC Sealer (Brassler, USA) was used. All the root canal procedures were performed by two skilled and experienced endodontists. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of all the patients was done for assessing gutta-percha-filled area (GPFA) and the prognosis. Results: Clinical and radiographic success was seen in 90% of the patients of group I while it was seen in 95% of the patients of group II. Statistically, nonsignificant results were obtained in the comparison of the efficacy of both the obturation techniques. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it can be opined that in patients undergoing root canal therapy, both the obturation techniques can be used with equal effectiveness. Clinical significance: The present study helps us in envisaging the preferable obturation technique out of lateral condensation technique and CBO technique when the influence of treatment variables is also instituted. This study enhances the scope of obturation techniques in the discipline of endodontics.

  1. Seltzer S. Repair following root canal therapy. In: Endodontology: biologic considerations in endodontic procedures, vol. 2, Philadelphia: Lea Fabinger; 1988. pp. 389–438.
  2. Barrieshi-Nusair K, Al-Omari M, Al-Hiyasat A. Radiographic technical quality of root canal treatment performed by dental students at the dental teaching center in Jordan. J Dent 2004;1132(4):301–306. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.01.002.
  3. Sarin A, Gupta P, Sachdeva J, et al. Effect of different obturation techniques on the prognosis of endodontic therapy: a retrospective comparative analysis. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(7):582–586. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1893.
  4. Ricucci D, Lin LM, Spångberg LS. Wound healing of apical tissues after root canal therapy: a long-term clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic observation study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;10(8):609–621. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.05.028.
  5. Motamedi MRK, Davoodi SHR, Saeidi A, et al. Technical quality of root canal therapies performed by novice dental students in preclinical practice. Dent Res J 2015;12(4):365–371. DOI: 10.4103/1735-3327.161460.
  6. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33(1):159–174. DOI: 10.2307/2529310.
  7. Eleftheriadis G, Lambrianidis T. Technical quality of root canal treatment and detection of iatrogenic errors in an undergraduate dental clinic. Int Endod J 2005;38(10):725–734. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01008.x.
  8. Tamarut T, Kovacevic M, Glavicic S. Influence of the length of instrumentation and canal obturation on the success of endodontic therapy. A 10-year clinical follow-up. Am J Dent 2006;19(4):211–216.
  9. Gencoglu N. Comparison of 6 different gutta-percha techniques (part II): Thermafil, JS Quick-fill, soft core, Microseal, system B, and lateral condensation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Endod 2003;96(1):91–95. DOI: 10.1016/S1079-2104(02)91704-X.
  10. Johnson WB. A new gutta-percha technique. J Endodont 1978;4(6):184–188. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(78)80173-3.
  11. Smith C, Setchell D, Harty F. Factors influencing the success of conventional root canal therapy—a five-year retrospective study. Int Endodon J 1993;26(6):321–333. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1993.tb00765.x.
  12. Swartz DB, Skidmore AE, Griffin JA. Twenty years of endodontic success and failure. J Endodont 1983;9(5):198–202. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(83)80092-2.
  13. American Association of Endodontics. AAE and foundation approve definition of endodontic outcomes. Communiqué 2005;8(10):21–23.
  14. Qureshi B, Munir B, Akbar I. A comparison of thermafil and lateral condensation techniques in obturation of root canal systems. Pakistan Oral Dent J 2012;3(2):531–534.
  15. Dhingra A, Kochar R, Banerjee S, et al. Comparative evaluation of the canal curvature modifications after instrumentation with one shape rotary and wave one reciprocating files. J Conserv 2014;17(2):138–144. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.128049.
  16. Kandemir DG, Çalışkan MK. A prospective randomized comparative study of cold lateral condensation versus core/gutta-percha in teeth with periapical lesions. JOE 2016;42(2):206–210. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.10.022.
  17. Ansari BB, Umer F, Khan FR. A clinical trial of cold lateral compaction with Obtura II technique in root canal obturation. J Conserv Dent 2012;15(3):156–160. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.94591.
  18. Kandaswamy D, Venkateshbabu N, Reddy GK, et al. Comparison of laterally condensed, vertically compacted thermoplasticized, cold free-flow GP obturations - a volumetric analysis using spiral CT. J Conserv Dent 2009;12(2):145–149. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.58334.
  19. Ruchi G, Anil D, Nidhi RP. Comparative evaluation of three different obturating techniques lateral compaction, thermafil and calamus for filling area and voids using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study. J Clin Diagnos Res 2015;9(8):15–17.
  20. Robert H, Robert G, Gerald NG, et al. Comparative analysis of carrier-based obturation and lateral compaction: a retrospective clinical outcomes study. Int J Dentis 2012;2(8):1–8.
  21. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K. Tooth survival following non-surgical root canal treatment: a systematic review of the literature. Int Endodon J 2010;43(3):171–189. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01671.x.
  22. Allison DA, Weber CR, Walton RE. The influence of the method of canal preparation on the quality of apical and coronal obturation. J Endodont 1979;5(10):298–304. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(79)80078-3.
  23. Wu MK, Shemesh H, Wesselink PR. Limitations of previously published systematic reviews evaluating the outcome of endodontic treatment. Int Endodon J 2009;42(8):656–666. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01600.x.
  24. Fernandez R, Cadavid D, Zapata SM, et al. Impact of three radiographic methods in the outcome of nonsurgical endodontic treatment: a five-year follow-up. J Endod 2013;39(9):1097–1103. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.002.
  25. Van der Borden WG, Wang X, Wu MK, et al. Area and 3-dimensional volumetric changes of periapical lesions after root canal treatments. J Endod 2013;39(10):1245–1259. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.001.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.