World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 2 ( March-April, 2021 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Assessment of the Color Stability of Two Different Tooth-colored Restorative Materials Used in Primary Teeth: A Comparative Study

Narendra V Penumatsa

Keywords : Beverages, Color steadiness, Esthetics, Spectrophotometer

Citation Information : Penumatsa NV. Assessment of the Color Stability of Two Different Tooth-colored Restorative Materials Used in Primary Teeth: A Comparative Study. World J Dent 2021; 12 (2):103-106.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1801

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-04-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim and objective: The current research aimed to appraise the color stability of two different tooth-colored restorative materials employed in primary teeth. Materials and methods: Ninety primary molar teeth that were extracted for various therapeutic reasons were included in the current study. Class V cavity preparation was done on the buccal surface of these 90 primary molar teeth. Depending on the type of restorative supply used, the molar teeth were randomly allocated to one of the two equivalent groups (n = 45) that is group I received nanocomposite resin while group II had resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) restoration. Rehydration after cavity preparation was achieved by keeping the samples in distilled water for 1 day. Following rehydration, these samples were washed and dried up with filter paper, and the baseline color quantification was performed. After the same, the above group samples were immersed for 10 minutes each day in three dissimilar but routinely used children\'s beverages that are an aerated beverage, ice candy, chocolate milk, and Bournvita milk. The color disparity of each sample was quantified with a reflectance spectrophotometer. Results: Nanocomposite resin (4.28 ± 0.02 to 11.04 ± 0.18) portrayed less resistance to color variation in contrast to RMGIC (4.74 ± 0.53 to 8.12 ± 0.12) following immersion in the aerated beverage. Following dipping in the ice candy, nanocomposite resin (4.46 ± 0.61 to 9.98 ± 0.42) depicted higher shade change in comparison to RMGIC (4.89 ± 0.22 to 6.30 ± 0.09). Following the immersion in chocolate milk and Bournvita milk, RMGIC (4.60 ± 0.20 to 5.96 ± 0.29) found trivial color variation as judged against nanocomposite resin (4.96 ± 0.01 to 8.68 ± 0.16). Conclusion: The present study concluded that the color stability of the RMGIC group showed higher resistance to staining as compared to nanocomposite resin with all beverages used in this study. Clinical significance: Children drink and eat foods that are bright and colorful. These substances contain food additives that can blemish not only the natural teeth but also the restorations. As esthetics and appearance are of foremost significance for both parents and their children, the prolonged color steadiness of restorative supplies is of extreme significance.


PDF Share
  1. Sikri VK. Color: implications in dentistry. J Conserv Dent 2010;13(4):249–255. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.73381.
  2. Bezgin T, Ozer L, Oz FT, et al. Effect of toothbrushing on color changes of esthetic restorative materials. J Esthe Restorat Dentis 2015;27(1):S65–S73. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12136.
  3. Bagheri R, Burrow MF, Tyas M. Influence of food simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. J Dentis 2005;33(5):389–398. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.10.018.
  4. Mazaheri R, Malekipour MR, Seddighi H, et al. Effect of common drinks on the color stability of microhybrid and nanohybrid composites in children. J Mashhad Dent School 2013;37:163–176.
  5. Yoonis E, Kukletová M. Tooth colored dental restorative materials in primary dentition. Scr Med 2009;82:108–114.
  6. Hotwani K, Thosar N, Baliga S. Comparative in vitro assessment of color stability of hybrid esthetic restorative materials against various children's beverages. J Conserv Dent 2014;17(1):70–74. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.124154.
  7. Imparato JC, Garcia A, Bonifacio CC, et al. Color stability of esthetic ion-releasing restorative materials subjected to pH variations. J Dent Child (Chic) 2007;74:189–193.
  8. Padiyar N, Kaurani P. Colour stability: an important physical property of esthetic restorative materials. Int J Clin Dent Sci 2010;1:81–84.
  9. Council on Dental Materials and Devices. Revised American Dental Association specification No 12 for denture base polymers. J Am Dent Assoc 1975;90(2):451–458. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1975.0069.
  10. Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Color and opacity variations in three different resin-based composite products after water aging. Dent Mater 2004;20(6):530–534. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2002.11.001.
  11. Ruyter IE, Nilner K, Moller B. Color stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers. Dent Mater 1987;3(5):246–251. DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(87)80081-7.
  12. Tunc ES, Bayrak S, Guler AU, et al. The effects of children's drinks on color stability of various restorative materials. J Clin Pediat Dentis 2010;34(2):147–150.
  13. Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 1989;68(5):819–822. DOI: 10.1177/00220345890680051301.
  14. Chan KC, Fuller JL, Hormati AA. The ability of foods to stain two composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43(5):542–545. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(80)90328-5.
  15. Skrtic D, Antonucci JM, McDonough WG, et al. Effect of chemical structure and composition of the resin phase on mechanical strength and vinyl conversion of amorphous calcium phosphate-based composites. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004;68(4):763–772. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.20111.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.