World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 3 ( May-June, 2020 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

Prosthodontic Rehabilitation of a Patient with Kennedy's Class I and Class II Using an Extended Precision Attachment: A Case Report

Yashashwini N Simha, Ramesh P Nayakar

Keywords : Fixed partial denture, Full-mouth rehabilitation, Precision attachment, Removable partial denture

Citation Information : Simha YN, Nayakar RP. Prosthodontic Rehabilitation of a Patient with Kennedy's Class I and Class II Using an Extended Precision Attachment: A Case Report. World J Dent 2020; 11 (3):226-230.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1727

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 27-07-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: To achieve a full-mouth rehabilitation of partial edentulousness using modified/extended precision attachments in a removable partial denture (RPD). Background: The success of a prosthodontic rehabilitation requires crucial balance between the modern and conventional treatment techniques. The attachment-retained partial dentures are one such type of prosthodontic treatment modality. Most traditional RPD are well designed but not used by the patient only because the individual does not prefer its appearance and the retentive quality. A modified extended precision attachment for eliminating metal display to upgrade the esthetics and to improve the retention of a long-span partial edentulous arch restored with a prosthodontic rehabilitation is described in this article. Case description: A 58-year-old male patient was referred to the Department of Prosthodontics for the replacement of missing teeth. On clinical examinations, it was diagnosed Kennedy\'s class I in the maxillary arch and class II in the mandibular arch with a reduced vertical dimension of occlusion. Precision attachment-retained partial dentures were planned in the maxillary and the mandibular arch. Conclusion: The success of the RPD depends on the retentive components and the underlying residual alveolar ridge. This case report highlights the esthetic outcome and improved retention in the maxillary and mandibular partial denture using precision attachments. Clinical significance: The treatment plan explained satisfactorily restores the esthetics, masticatory function, and improves the retention of the prosthesis by using precision attachment.


  1. Makkar S, Chhabra A, Khare A. Attachment retained removable partial denture: a clinical report. Int J Clin Dent 2011;2(2):55–60.
  2. Peršić S, Kranjčić J, Pavičić DK, et al. Treatment outcomes based on patients’ self-reported measures after receiving new clasp or precision attachment-retained removable partial dentures. J Prosthodont 2017;26(2):115–122. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12395.
  3. Shetty NB, Shetty S, Nagaraj E, et al. Precision attachments for aesthetics and function: a case report. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8(1):268–270. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/6403.3949.
  4. Zitmann NU, Hagmann E, Weiger R. What is prevalence of various types of prosthetic dental restorations in Europe? Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18(Suppl 3):20–33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501. 2007.01435.x.
  5. Al Wazzan KA. The visible portion of anterior teeth at rest. J Contemp Dent Pract 2004;5(1):53–62. DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-5-1-53.
  6. Awang RA, Arief EM, Hassan A. Spring loaded plunger attachment for retention of removable partial denture: a case report. Arch Orofacial Sci 2008;3(1):32–35.
  7. Ma PS, Brudvik JS. Managing the maxillary partially edentulous patient with extensive anterior tooth loss and advanced periodontal disease using a removable partial denture: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100(4):259–263. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08) 60203-6.
  8. Ceka. http://wwwceka-precilinecom/. [Online]. Available from: http://www.ceka-preciline.com/ [Accessed 21 April 2020].
  9. Gupta S, Rani S, Sikri A, et al. Attachment retained cast partial denture: conventional and contemporary treatment perspectives. Int J Oral Care Res 2016;4(4):312–316. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10051- 0071.
  10. Öwall B. Precision attachment-retained removable partial dentures: Part 2. Long-term study of ball attachments. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8(1):21–28.
  11. Gupta N, Bhasin A, Gupta P, et al. Combined prosthesis with extracoronal castable precision attachments. Case Rep Dent 2013;2(3):65–69. DOI: 10.1155/2013/282617.
  12. Burns DR, Ward JE. A review of attachments for removable partial denture design: part 1. Classification and selection. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3(1):55–58.
  13. Burns DR, Ward JE. A review of attachments for removable partial denture design: Part 2. Treatment planning and attachment selection. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3(2):73–81.
  14. Vaidya S, Kapoor C, Bakshi Y, et al. Achieving an esthetic smile with fixed and removal prosthesis using extracoronal castable precision attachments. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2015;15(3):284–285. DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.155048.
  15. Wichmann MG, Kuntze W. Wear behavior of precision attachments. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12(5):123–128.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.