World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 1 ( January-February, 2020 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Evaluation of Genotoxic Effects of Panoramic Dental Radiography on Cells of Oral Mucosa by Micronucleus Assay and Evaluation of Time Period Required by Cells of Oral Mucosa to Recover from the Genotoxic Effects

Ivleen Kaur, Soheyl Sheikh, Shambulingappa Pallagati, Deepak Gupta, Ravinder Singh, Amit Aggarwal, Jyoti Mago

Keywords : Genetic mutation, Micronuclei, Panoramic radiography, Papanicolaou stain

Citation Information : Kaur I, Sheikh S, Pallagati S, Gupta D, Singh R, Aggarwal A, Mago J. Evaluation of Genotoxic Effects of Panoramic Dental Radiography on Cells of Oral Mucosa by Micronucleus Assay and Evaluation of Time Period Required by Cells of Oral Mucosa to Recover from the Genotoxic Effects. World J Dent 2020; 11 (1):17-23.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1703

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-02-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the genotoxic effects of X-rays on epithelial cells during panoramic dental radiography on the cells of the oral mucosa by micronucleus assay. It also aimed to evaluate the time period required by the cells of the oral mucosa of these patients to recover from these genotoxic effects. Materials and methods: Patients were divided into two age groups. Group I included subjects aged from 15 years to 25 years, while group II included subjects 40 to 50 years of age. Each group had 50 subjects. The histopathological sample was obtained with the help of a wooden spatula in both keratinized and non-keratinized mucosa pre-exposure, 10th day and 21st day post-exposure, respectively, and micronuclei were calculated. Results: There was a statistically significant increase in micronuclei on 10th day and a statistically significant decrease in micronuclei on 21st day post-exposure in both keratinized and non-keratinized mucosa and when compared with pre-exposure. It revealed more marked effect on keratinized mucosa. Furthermore, in group II, no statistically significant differences were noted at the time of pre-exposure and on the 10th day post-exposure as well as on the 21st day post-exposure. Conclusion: Genotoxic effects do take place due to panoramic radiography; it has also been seen that these genotoxic effects are reversible as these cells tend to recover from the effects. Clinical significance: Since radiography is an integral part of day-to-day dental practice and patients are frequently exposed to panoramic radiography, it is emphasized that panoramic radiography may be done only when necessary after weighing the benefits against the risks. X-rays being ionizing radiation are well known as mutagens and carcinogens in the human population. Thus, it becomes important that to detect the radiation effects of low-dose diagnostic radiographic exposures, a sensitive analysis and specific approach is needed.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Frankel RI. Centennial of Rontgen’s discovery of X-rays. West J Med 1996;164(6):497–501.
  2. Little JB. Radiation carcinogenesis. Carcinogensis 2000;21(3):397–404. DOI: 10.1093/carcin/21.3.397
  3. Ribeiro D, Oliveira G, Castro G, et al. Cytogenetic biomonitoring in patients exposed to dental X-rays: comparison between adults and children. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37(7):404–407. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/58548698.
  4. Bansal H, Sandhu V, Bhandari R, et al. Evaluation of micronuclei in tobacco users: a study in punjabi population. Contemp Clin Dent 2012;3(2):184–187. DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.96825.
  5. Bloching M, Hofmann A, Lautenschlager C, et al. Exfoliative cytology of normal buccal mucosa to predict the relative risk of cancer in the upper aerodigestive tract using the MN-assay. Oral Oncol 2000;36(6):550–555. DOI: 10.1016/S1368-8375(00)00051-8.
  6. Neri M, Fucic A, Knudsen LE, et al. Micronuclei frequency in children exposed to environmental mutagens: a review. Mutat Res 2003;544(2–3):243–254. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2003.06.009.
  7. Fenech M. Biomarkers of genetic damage for cancer epidemiology. Toxicology 2002;181–182:411–416. DOI : 10.1016/S0300-483X(02)00480-8.
  8. Stich HF, Rosin MP. Quantitating the synergistic effect of smoking and alcohol consumption with the micronucleus test on human buccal mucosa cells. Int J Cancer 1983;31(3):305–308. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910310309.
  9. Sarto F, Giacomelli L, Mazzotti D, et al. The micronucleus assay in exfoliated cells of the human buccal mucosa. Mutagenesis 1987;2(1):11–17. DOI: 10.1093/mutage/2.1.11.
  10. Suhas S, Ganapathy K, Gayatridevi, et al. Application of the micronucleus test to exfoliated epithelial cells from the oral cavity of beedi smokers, a high-risk group for oral cancer. Mutat Res 2004;561(1–2):15–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2004.03.001.
  11. Delfino V, Casartelli G, Garzoglio B, et al. Micronuclei and p53 accumulation in preneoplastic and malignant lesions of the head and neck. Mutagenesis 2002;17(1):73–77. DOI: 10.1093/mutage/17.1.73.
  12. Ayyad SB, Israel E, El-Setouhy M, et al. Evaluation of Papanicolaou stain for studying micronuclei in buccal cells under field conditions. Acta Cytol 2006;50(4):398–402. DOI: 10.1159/000325980.
  13. Tolbert PE, Shy CM, Allen JW. Micronuclei and other nuclear anomalies in buccal smears: methods development. Mutat Res 1992;271(1):69–77. DOI: 10.1016/0165-1161(92)90033-I.
  14. Squier CA, Kremer MJ. Biology of oral mucosa and esophagus. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2001;29:7–15. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals. jncimonographs.a003443.
  15. Cerqueira E, Meireles J, Lopes M, et al. Genotoxic effects of X-rays on keratinized mucosa cells during panoramic dental radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37(7):398–403. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/56848097.
  16. Sheikh S, Pallagatti S, Grewal H, et al. Genotoxicity of digital panoramic radiography on oral epithelial tissues. Quintessence Int 2012;43(8):719–725.
  17. Pastor S, Gutiérrez S, Creus A, et al. Micronuclei in peripheral lymphocytes and buccal epithelial cells of Polish farmers exposed to pesticides. Mutat Res 2001;495(1–2):147–156. DOI: 10.1016/S1383-5718(01)00206-6.
  18. Langland OE, Langlais RP, Preece J. Principles of Dental Imaging. Philadephia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002.
  19. Gibbs SJ. Biological effects of radiation from dental radiography. Council on dental materials, instruments and equipment. J Am Dent Assoc 1985;105(2):275–281. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1982.0093.
  20. Angelieri F, Moleirinho T, Carlin V, et al. Biomonitoringoral epithelial cells in smokers and non-smokers submitted to panoramic X-ray: comparison between buccal mucosa and lateral border of the tongue. Clin Oral Invest 2010;14(6):669–674. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-009-0345-6.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.