World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 6 ( November-December, 2019 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Role of Orthopantomogram as an Ancillary to Lateral Cephalogram in Diagnosis of Vertical Malocclusions: A Comparative Study

Sonika Dash, Bhagabati P Dash, Pritam Mohanty, Samarendra Dash, Jasbir Meher, Vidya Bhushan

Keywords : Deep bite, Lateral cephalogram, Open bite, Orthopantomogram

Citation Information : Dash S, Dash BP, Mohanty P, Dash S, Meher J, Bhushan V. Role of Orthopantomogram as an Ancillary to Lateral Cephalogram in Diagnosis of Vertical Malocclusions: A Comparative Study. World J Dent 2019; 10 (6):445-448.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1673

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-12-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: Vertical malocclusion is an important and commonly seen anomaly of the craniofacial complex. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the efficiency of the orthopantomogram (OPG) over the lateral cephalogram. Materials and methods: A total of 60 radiographs were collected from patients. Independent reference planes were set up in the maxilla and the mandible. The inclusion criteria of the study involved subjects in the age group of 20–25 years, class I skeletal and dental relationship with an overjet, and overbite in the range of 2–4 mm with an orthognathic profile. Exclusion criteria involved crowding, asymmetry, or spacing along with no history of prior orthodontic or surgical treatment. Mean values were evaluated using the z test. The statistical analysis was performed by using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Results: Significant values were obtained for effective length of ramus, effective length of corpus, effective height of corpus, interocclusal distance, panoramic alternative of gonial angle (PGOA), panoramic alternative condylar inclination (PCOI), panoramic alternative of mandibular plane angle (PMPA), and maxillary occlusal angle. Conclusion: On completion of our study, we can conclude that the OPG can be used in the assessment of vertical malocclusion quantitatively. Clinical significance: Less radiation exposure and easy availability of OPGs will be useful clinically.


PDF Share
  1. Angle EH. Classification of malocclusion. Dental Cosmos 1899;41(3):248.
  2. Benet N. Science and practice of dental surgery. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1931.
  3. Lareheim TA, Svanaes DB, Johannessens S. Reproducibility of radiographs with orthopantomograph: tooth length assessment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984;58(6):736–741. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(84)90045-8.
  4. Levandoski R. Mandibular Whiplash. Part-I. An extension flexion injury of the temporomandibular joints. Funct Orthod 1993;10(1):26–29.
  5. Akcom MO, Altiok T, Ozdiler E. Panoramic radiographs: a tool for investigating skeletal pattern. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003;123(2):175–181. DOI: 10.1067/mod.2003.3.
  6. Yanez-Vico MR, Linares AI, Lagares DT, et al. Diagnostic evaluation of the craniofacial asymmetry. Literature Review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;15(3):494–498. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.15.e494.
  7. Gupta S, Jain S. Orthopantomographic analysis for assessment of mandibular asymmetry. J Indian Orthod Soc 2012;46(1):33–37. DOI: 10.1177/0974909820120105.
  8. Biavati FS, Ugolini A, Laffi N, et al. Early diagnostic evaluation of mandibular symmetry using orthopantomogram. Indian J Dent Res 2014;25(2):154–159. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.135909.
  9. Keiji M, Mikko A, Kaarina H. Determination of gonial angle from the orthopantomogram. Angle Orthod 1977;47(2):107–110. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1977)047<0107:DOTGAF>2.0.CO;2.
  10. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology principles and interpretations. 4th ed., Mosby;2000. pp. 205–216.
  11. Kumar SS, Thailavathy V, Divya L, et al. Comparison of Orthopantomogram and lateral cephalogram for mandibular measurements. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2017;9(5):92–95. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_98_17.
  12. Girish K, Chandrika K, Karuna, et al. Reliability of panoramic radiography in assessing gonial angle compared to lateral cephalogram in adult patients with class I malocclusion. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 2016;28(3):252–255. DOI: 10.4103/0972-1363.195668.
  13. Ganeiber T, Bugaighis I. Assessment of the validity of orthopantomographs in the evaluation of mandibular steepness in Libya. J Orthod Sci 2018;7(1):14. DOI: 10.4103/jos.JOS_148_17.
  14. Mattila K, Altonen M, Haavikko K. Determination of the Gonial Angle from the Orthopantomogram. Angle Orthod 1977;47(2):107–110.
  15. Bhullar M, Uppal A, Kochhar G, et al. Comparison of gonial angle determination from cephalograms and orthopantomogram. Indian J Dent 2014;5(3):123–126. DOI: 10.4103/0975-962X.140820.
  16. Jackson PH, Dickson GC, Birnie DJ. Digital image processing of cephalometric radiographs: a preliminary report. Br J Orthod 1985;12:122–132. DOI: 10.1179/bjo.12.3.122.
  17. Richardson A. Skeletal factors in anterior open bite and deep overbite. Am J Orthodontics 1969;56(2):114–127. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(69)90228-0.
  18. Hapak FM. Cephalometric appraisal of the open bite case. Angle Orthod 1964;34(1):65–72.
  19. Subtelny JD, Skuda M. Open bite: diagnosis and treatment. Am J Orthod 1964;50(5):337–358. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(64)90175-7.
  20. Nahoum HI. Vertical proportions and the palatal plane in anterior open-bite. Am J Orthod 1971;59(3):273–282. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(71)90100-X.
  21. Swinehart EW. A clinical study of open bite. Am J Orthod 1942;28(1):18–34. DOI: 10.1016/S0096-6347(42)90545-3.
  22. Neff CW, Kydd WL. The open bite: physiology and occlusion. J Dent Res 1966;36(4):351–357. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1966)036<0351:TOBPAO>2.0.CO;2.
  23. Samawi SB, Burke PH. Distortion in the orthopantomogram. Br J Orthod 1984;11(2):100–107. DOI: 10.1179/bjo.11.2.100.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.