World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 6 ( November-December, 2019 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Assessment of the Effect of Three Agitation Techniques on the Removal Efficacy of Sodium Hypochlorite for the Organic Films

Saifalarab A Mohmmed, Anas F Mahdee

Keywords : Agitation, Biofilm, Irrigation, Root canal, Sodium hypochlorite

Citation Information : Mohmmed SA, Mahdee AF. Assessment of the Effect of Three Agitation Techniques on the Removal Efficacy of Sodium Hypochlorite for the Organic Films. World J Dent 2019; 10 (6):440-444.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1676

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-12-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: Root canal irrigation is an essential step in the root canal treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of three agitation methods [manual-dynamic irrigation gutta-percha (GP), EndoActivator, and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI)] for 2.5% NaOCl irrigation solution in debriding two organic films (collagen and hydrogel) from simulated root canal walls. Materials and methods: Twenty-four Endo-Vu blocks were used to create half root canals using Profile instruments. The working length was 0.5 mm short of the canal end. The canal was enlarged to 30/06. The canals were allocated into two experimental groups (n = 12): group I (collagen film models), group II (hydrogel layer models). Each group was subdivided into three equal subgroups (n = 4): manual-dynamic irrigation (GP), EndoActivator sonic irrigation, and PUI. Each half canal was then covered with a flat glass slide, before quantifying the collagen or hydrogel film by using the Image-Pro Plus 4.5 and ipWin4 software. The data were analyzed using the generalized linear mixed model. Results: The duration of irrigation had a significant influence on surface area coverage with the residual film (hydrogel, collagen). Exposure of the organic film to PUI irrigation was significantly associated with more film removal than GP irrigation (p = 0.0001). Exposure of the organic film to EndoActivator irrigation was significantly associated with more film removal than GP irrigation (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The protocol of EndoActivator agitation of the NaOCl irrigant is more effective in simulant biofilm removal than gutta-percha pumping but less effective than passive ultrasonic agitation. Clinical significance: The findings from this study make several contributions to enhance our understanding of the use of passive agitation of NaOCl, when compared to sonic and manual agitation as a final irrigation protocol, in the removal of the biofilm from the apical, middle, and coronal thirds of the root canal.


PDF Share
  1. Sundqvist G. Taxonomy, ecology, and pathogenicity of the root canal flora. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;78(4):522–530. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(94)90047-7.
  2. Ramachandran Nair PN. Light and electron microscopic studies of root canal flora and periapical lesions. J Endod 1987;13(1):29–39. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80089-4.
  3. European Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J 2006;39(12):921–930. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01180.x.
  4. Spratt D, Pratten J, Wilson M, et al. An in vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of irrigants on biofilms of root canal isolates. Int Endod J 2001;34(4):300–307. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00392.x.
  5. Clegg M, Vertucci F, Walker C, et al. The effect of exposure to irrigant solutions on apical dentin biofilms in vitro. J Endod 2006;32(5): 434–437. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.07.002.
  6. Bryce G, O'Donnell D, Ready D, et al. Contemporary root canal irrigants are able to disrupt and eradicate single-and dual-species biofilms. J Endod 2009;35(9):1243–1248. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.05.034.
  7. Bronnec F, Bouillaguet S, Machtou P. Ex vivo assessment of irrigant penetration and renewal during the final irrigation regimen. Int Endod J 2010;43(8):663–672. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01723.x.
  8. Moorer W, Wesselink P. Factors promoting the tissue dissolving capability of sodium hypochlorite. Int Endod J 1982;15(4):187–196. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1982.tb01277.x.
  9. De Macedo RG. Optimizing the chemical aspect of root canal irrigation, 1st ed., Enschede: Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam; 2013.
  10. Cunningham WT, Martin H, Forrest WR. Evaluation of root canal debridement by the endosonic ultrasonic synergistic system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982;53(4):401–404. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(82)90442-X.
  11. Bukiet F, Soler T, Guivarch M, et al. Factors affecting the viscosity of sodium hypochlorite and their effect on irrigant flow. Int Endod J 2013;46(10):954–961. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12086.
  12. Basrani B, Haapasalo M. Update on endodontic irrigating solutions. Endod Topics 2012;27(1):74–102. DOI: 10.1111/etp.12031.
  13. Huang TY, Gulabivala K, Ng YL. A bio-molecular film ex vivo model to evaluate the influence of canal dimensions and irrigation variables on the efficacy of irrigation. Int Endod J 2008;41(1):60–71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01317.x.
  14. Popa EG, Gomes ME, Reis RL. Cell delivery systems using alginate–carrageenan hydrogel beads and fibers for regenerative medicine applications. Biomacromolecules 2011;12(11):3952–3961. DOI: 10.1021/bm200965x.
  15. Jiang LM, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, et al. Evaluation of a sonic device designed to activate irrigant in the root canal. J Endod 2010;36(1): 143–146. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.06.009.
  16. Lee SJ, Wu MK, Wesselink P. The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from different-sized simulated plastic root canals. Int Endod J 2004;37(9):607–612. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00857.x.
  17. Gulabivala K, Stock CJR, Lewsey JD, et al. Effectiveness of electrochemically activated water as an irrigant in an infected tooth model. Int Endod J 2004;37(9):624–631. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00867.x.
  18. Verhaagen B, Boutsioukis C, Van der Sluis L, et al. Acoustic streaming induced by an ultrasonically oscillating endodontic file. J Acoust Soc Am 2014;135(4):1717–1730. DOI: 10.1121/1.4868397.
  19. McGill S, Gulabivala K, Mordan N, et al. The efficacy of dynamic irrigation using a commercially available system (RinsEndo®) determined by removal of a collagen ‘bio-molecular film’ from an ex vivo model. Int Endod J 2008;41(7):602–608. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01408.x.
  20. Khademi A, Yazdizadeh M, Feizianfard M. Determination of the minimum instrumentation size for penetration of irrigants to the apical third of root canal systems. J Endod 2006;32(5):417–420. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.11.008.
  21. Otake K, Inomata H, Konno M, et al. A new model for the thermally induced volume phase transition of gels. J Chem Phys 1989;91(2):1345–1350. DOI: 10.1063/1.457157.
  22. Mohmmed S, Vianna ME, Penny MR, et al. A novel experimental approach to investigate the effect of different agitation methods using sodium hypochlorite as an irrigant on the rate of bacterial biofilm removal from the wall of a simulated root canal model. Dent Mater 2016;32(10):1289–1300. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.07.013.
  23. Ahmad M, Pitt Ford T, Crum L, et al. Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: acoustic cavitation and its relevance. J Endod 1988;14(10): 486–493. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80105-5.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.