World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 4 ( July-August, 2019 ) > List of Articles


Health-related Quality of Life and Satisfaction of the Patient Following Orthognathic Surgery in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Ghadi DA Duhduh, Tasneem KM Arishi, Omar A Darraj, Aziza MA Alqadi

Keywords : Facial esthetic, Orthognathic surgery, Postoperative complication, Quality of life

Citation Information : Duhduh GD, Arishi TK, Darraj OA, Alqadi AM. Health-related Quality of Life and Satisfaction of the Patient Following Orthognathic Surgery in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. World J Dent 2019; 10 (4):270-274.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1646

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-08-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Introduction: Most patients undergo orthognathic surgery (OS) to improve their beauty and correct functional imbalances. OS is also performed in the case of temporomandibular joint disorders to reduce facial pain and enhance the quality of life of patients. Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the quality of life of patients who undergo OS in terms of esthetic appearances, chewing, and postoperative complications and to assess the percentage of satisfaction among patients in terms of facial appearances, friends’ and relatives’ opinions, and functional performance of the oral cavity. Materials and methods: Data of 73 patients who underwent OS in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia were collected from their medical records. A brief questionnaire was prepared on the basis of previous studies with some modifications. Data were collected and a questionnaire was answered via a telephone interview with these patients. Questions were related to the patients’ basic demographic information and their postoperative complications, such as swelling, pain, chewing difficulty, and snoring. The second part was introduced as a questionnaire designed by the researchers to measure the patients’ satisfaction regarding OS. This questionnaire was related to the appearance of the face from the side and front views and to the level of attractiveness perceived by patients themselves and their relatives and friends after OS. This questionnaire also included improvements in oral functions, such as chewing. The overall performance of the oral cavity was assessed. Data were analyzed using SPSS. Results: A total of 50 patients completed the telephone interview and the examination. The highest number of subjects was in the young age group of 19–25 years. Of these patients, 31 (62%) showed a positive result on the snoring outcomes, and 25 (50%) complained of pain and swelling. Furthermore, 33 (66%) and 27 (54%) patients reported improvements in chewing and facial esthetic outcomes, respectively. More than 50% of the patients were satisfied in their facial appearance from the side and front views. Patients’ perception of their attractiveness and their friends’ and family's opinion about their facial appearance recorded were between 60% and 62%. Other questions dealing with improvements in eating, chewing, and overall oral cavity performance gained 42–18%. All variables showed significant differences at the level of p value more than 0.050. Conclusion: Overall, the majority of the OS patients showed positive results in terms of chewing, snoring, facial esthetics, pain, and swelling during their recovery time. Patients are mostly satisfied with the overall facial attractiveness results as well as the opinions of their relatives and friends. Clinical significance: OS is performed to enhance the appearance and function of the oral cavity, which may end with a positive effect of the patient's oral function, self-esteem, and social interaction.

PDF Share
  1. Bellucci CC, Kapp-Simon KA. Psychological considerations in orthognathic surgery. Clin Plast Surg 2007;34:e11–e16. DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2007.04.004.
  2. Cunningham SJ, Hunt NP. Quality of life and its importance in orthodontics. J Orthod 2001;28:152–158. DOI: 10.1093/ortho/28.2.152.
  3. Bennett ME, Phillips CL. Assessment of health-related quality of life for patients with severe skeletal disharmony: a review of the issues. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1999;14:65–75.
  4. Han CW, Yajima Y, et al. Construct validity of the Frenchay activities index for community-dwelling elderly in Japan. Tohoku J Exp Med 2006;210:99–107. DOI: 10.1620/tjem.210.99.
  5. Baek SH, Ahn HW, et al. Surgery-first approach in skeletal Class III malocclusion treated with 2-jaw surgery: evaluation of surgical movement and postoperative orthodontic treatment. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:332–338. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181cf5fd4.
  6. Wright EF, North SL. Management and Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders: A Clinical Perspective. J Man Manip Ther 2009;17(4):247–254. DOI: 10.1179/106698109791352184.
  7. Yu HB, Mao LX, et al. The surgery-first approach in orthognathic surgery: a retrospective study of 50 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;44:1463–1467. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.05.024.
  8. Ko EW, Hsu SS, et al. Comparison of progressive cephalometric changes and postsurgical stability of skeletal Class III correction with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:1469–1477. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.07.022.
  9. Liou EJ, Chen PH, et al. Surgery-first accelerated orthognathic surgery: orthodontic guidelines and setup for model surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:771–780. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.11.011.
  10. Liao YF, Chiu YT, et al. Presurgical orthodontics vs no presurgical orthodontics: treatment outcome of surgical-orthodontic correction for skeletal Class III open bite. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:2074–2083. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f52710.
  11. Modig M, Andersson L, et al. Patients’ perception of improvement after orthognathic surgery: pilot study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;44:24–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.07.016.
  12. Zahrani AA. Patients satisfaction with orthognathic surgery; a study in a selected Saudi sample. Pakistan Oral Dent J 2004;24(2):129–134.
  13. Almasri M, Bukhari SM. Considerations to Planning Orthognathic Surgery in Different Regions of Saudi and the Middle East. Amer J Public Health Research 2014;2(1):6–9. DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-2-1-2.
  14. AlBarakati SF, Baidas LF. Orthognathic surgical norms for a sample of Saudi adults: Hard tissue measurements. Saudi Dent J 2010;22: 133–139. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2010.04.007.
  15. Abdullah WA. Changes in quality of life after orthognathic surgery in Saudi patients. Saudi Dent J 2015;27:161–164. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.12.001.
  16. Al Asseri N. Orthognathic surgery: a ten years epidemiological analysis of multi-centers in Riyadh region. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;44:e24. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.08.435.
  17. Zahid M, Al-Qarni M, et al. The Effectiveness of Bimaxillary Osteotomy on the Psychological and Functional Status of Patients. EC Dent Sci 2017;16(6):242–248.
  18. Silva ACA, Carvalho RAS, et al. Evaluation of life quality of patients submitted to orthognathic surgery. Dental Press J Orthod 2013;18(5):107–114. DOI: 10.1590/S2176-94512013000500018.
  19. Yang L, Yu-dong Xiao Y-D, et al. Does the Surgery-First Approach Produce Better Outcomes in Orthognathic Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;75:2422–2429. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.06.002.
  20. Murphy C, Kearns G, et al. The clinical relevance of orthognathic surgery on quality of life. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;40:926–930. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.04.001.
  21. Al-Asfour A, Waheedi M, et al. Survey of patient experiences of orthognathic surgery: health-related quality of life and satisfaction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;47(6):726–773. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.12.010.
  22. Huang CS, Hsu SS, et al. Systematic review of the surgery-first approach in orthognathic surgery. Biomed J 2014;37:184–190. DOI: 10.4103/2319-4170.126863.
  23. Motegi E, Hatch JP, et al. Health related quality of life and psychosocial function 5 years after orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:138–143. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(03) 00391-3.
  24. Soh CL, Narayanan N. Quality of life assessment in patients with dentofacial deformity undergoing orthognathic surgery—A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;42:974–980. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.03.023.
  25. Park J-E, Bae S-H, et al. The structural changes of pharyngeal airway contributing to snoring after orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;39:22–30. DOI: 10.1186/s40902-017-0120-6.
  26. Cunningham SJ, Hunt NP, et al. Perceptions of outcome following orthognathic surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;34:210–213. DOI: 10.1016/S0266-4356(96)90271-5.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.