World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 2 ( March-April, 2019 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Preseptal Transconjunctival Approach: A Retrospective Review

Shaifulizan Ab Rahman, Mohd SF Mohamad, Sanjida Haque

Keywords : Facial fractures, Preseptal transconjunctival approach,Complication

Citation Information : Rahman SA, Mohamad MS, Haque S. Preseptal Transconjunctival Approach: A Retrospective Review. World J Dent 2019; 10 (2):98-102.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1612

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-04-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine types of facial fractures that use the preseptal transconjunctival approach and to evaluate the lower eyelid condition. Materials and methods: Ninety-one patients who underwent open reduction internal fixation of facial fractures using preseptal transconjunctival approach from 2005–2013 were included and analyzed from clinical records. We evaluate the incidence of postoperative complication such as visible scar at rest, entropion, ectropion, scleral show, trichiasis, conjunctival granuloma, lower eyelid laceration, corneal lesion, and lacrimal drainage lesion. The types of facial fractures that frequently use this approach were also analyzed. Results: Four out of ninety-one patients were excluded because of insufficient data. Zygomatic complex fracture occurring in isolation or combination with other fracture was the commonest fracture type encountered (93.5%). Two complications (entropion and trichiasis) occurred in one out of eighty-seven patients. The complication rate in this study was very low at 1.1%. Conclusion: A preseptal transconjuctival approach is a versatile approach that can be used in all mid-face fracture situations providing an alternative to the invasive transcutaneous approach. It provides minimal complications with superior esthetic result. Clinical significance: The management of facial fractures that involve orbital rim or floor often poses a challenge to the surgeon because surgeons aim for complete repair of the orbital anatomy with least complication and superior esthetic result. Two surgical incisions existed in the process of reaching orbital bony component which is the transcutaneous and transconjunctival approach. It will help clinicians to know which approach provides minimal complication.


PDF Share
  1. Appling WD, Patrinely JR, Salzer TA. Transconjunctival Approach vs Subciliary Skin-Muscle Flap Approach for Orbital Fracture Repair. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;119(9):1000-1007.
  2. Bourguet, JV. Les herniesgraisseuses de l'orbite, Notre traitement chirurgical. Bull Acad Med (Paris) 1924:92:1270.
  3. Tessier, P. The conjunctival approach to the orbital floor and maxilla in congenital malformation and trauma. J Maxillofac Surg 1973;1(1): 3-8.
  4. Mullins JB, Holds JB, Branham GH, et al. Complicatios of the transconjunctival approach, a review of 400 cases. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997:123(4):385-388.
  5. Waite PD, Carr DD. The transconjunctival approach for treating orbital trauma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991;49(5):499-503.
  6. Holtmann B, Wray RC, Little AG. A randomised comparison of four incisions for orbital fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981;67(6): 731-737.
  7. Nordin R, Rahman NA, Rashdi MF, et al. Oral and Maxillofacial trauma caused by road traffic accident in two university hospitals in Malaysia: A cross sectional study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol 2015;27(2):166-171.
  8. Ramli R, Rahman RA, Hussaini HM, et al. A retroseptive study of oral and maxillofacial injuries in Seremban Hospital. Dent Traumatol 2011;27(2):122-126.
  9. Ramli R, Oxley J, Hillard P, et al. The effect of motorcycle helmet type, components and fixation status on facial injury in Klang Valley, Malaysia: a case control study. BMC Emergenc Med 2014;14:17
  10. Baumann A, Ewers R. Use of the preseptaltransconjunctival approach in orbit reconstruction surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59(3):287- 291.
  11. Novelli G, Ferrari L, Sozzi D, et al. Transconjunctival approach in orbital traumatology: A review of 56 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2011;39(4):266-270.
  12. Magnus WW, Castner Jr DV, Schonder AA, et al. A conjunctival approach to repair of fracture of medial wall of the orbit: report of a case. J Oral Surg 1971;29(9):664-667.
  13. Manganello-Souza LC, de Freitas RR. Transconjunctival approach to zygomatic and orbital floor fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;26(1):31-34.
  14. Patel PC, Sobota BT, Patel NM, Greene JS, Millman B. Comparison of transconjunctival versus subciliary approaches for orbital fractures: A review of 60 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Trauma 1998;4(1):17-21.
  15. Wray RC, Holtmann B, Ribaudo JM, et al. A comparison of conjunctival and subciliary incisions for orbital fractures. Br J Plast Surg 1977;30(2):142-145.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.