World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 1 ( January-February, 2019 ) > List of Articles


Efficacy of Overnight Intubation in Oral Oncological Surgeries: A Retrospective Study

Souvick Sarkar, Mohan Baliga, Subhagata Chakraborty, Shashank Jain, Antara Goswami

Keywords : Maxillofacial oncology, Overnight intubation, Tracheostomy

Citation Information : Sarkar S, Baliga M, Chakraborty S, Jain S, Goswami A. Efficacy of Overnight Intubation in Oral Oncological Surgeries: A Retrospective Study. World J Dent 2019; 10 (1):14-17.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1595

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-02-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Aim: In the postoperative period of maxillofacial oncological operations, tracheostomy is the most commonly used method for securing the airway. These untoward complications made practitioners chose alternative modalities like submental intubation, but literature support on alternatives to tracheostomy for oral oncologic cases is limited. The aim of this observational study is to ascertain whether the use of overnight intubation is a safer and cost-effective practice and if it can be considered an alternative to tracheostomy. Materials and methods: Thirty patients, 23 males and 7 females in the age group of 34-80 years who underwent treatment for head and neck cancer with major intraoral resection and a unilateral or bilateral neck dissection were included in the study. The following variables were recorded: age, sex, site of a tumor, type of neck dissection, use of mandibulotomy/ mandibulectomy, type of reconstruction, duration of stay in ICU, mean hospital stay and Mallampati classification. Postoperative complications, associated with the airway, if any, were recorded simultaneously. Results: None of the 30 patients required re-intubation nor did they develop any respiratory distress post-extubation. Conclusion: To conclude, mandatory unquestioned use of tracheostomy in every head and neck oncological case should be avoided and its use should be limited to the situations where overnight intubation is not feasible, prolonged duration of postoperative intubation is required or it is anticipated that return visits will be made by the patient. Clinical significance: The clinical significance of this study is to show that the mortality and morbidity associated with a tracheostomy can be avoided. Overnight intubation is the modality to replace tracheostomy and can be considered as the gold standard.

PDF Share
  1. Crosher R, Baldie C, Mitchell R. Selective use of tracheostomy in surgery for head and neck cancer: an audit. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;35:43-45.
  2. Castling B, Telfer M, Avery BS. Complications of tracheostomy in major head and neck cancer surgery; a retrospective study of 60 consecutive cases. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;32:3-5.
  3. Halfpenny W, McGurk M. Analysis oftracheostomy-associated morbidity after operations for head and neck cancer. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;38:509-512.
  4. Waldron J, Padgham ND, Hurley SE. Complications of emergency and elective tracheostomy: a retrospective study of 150 consecutive cases. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1990;72:218-220.
  5. Taicher S, Givol N, Peleg M, Ardekian L. Changing indications for tracheostomy in maxillofacial trauma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:292-296.
  6. Morton RP, Mellow CG, Dorman EB. Chest infection following head and neck surgery; a pilot study. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1990;15: 363-366.
  7. Rao MK, Reilley TE, Schuller DE, Young DC. Analysis of risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications in head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope 1992;102:45-47.
  8. Ong SK, Morton RP, Kolbe J, Whitlock RM, McIvor NP. Pulmonary complications following major head and neck surgery with tracheostomy: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of prophylactic antibiotics. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:1084-1087.
  9. Coyle MJ, Main B, Hughes C, Craven R, Alexander R, Porter G, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for head and neck oncology patients. Clinical Otolaryngology. 2016 Apr 1;41(2):118-126.
  10. Scutz P, Hamed H. Submental intubation versus tracheostomy in maxillofacial trauma patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66: 1404-1409.
  11. Niederman MS, Ferranti RD, Zeigler A, Merrill WW, Reynolds HY. Respiratory infection complicating long-term tracheostomy: the implication of persistent gram-negative tracheobronchial colonization. Chest. 1984 Jan 1;85(1):39-44.
  12. Rogers SN, Russell L, Lowe D. Patients’ experience of temporary tracheostomy after microvascular reconstruction for cancer of the head and neck. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2017 Jan 1;55(1):10-16.
  13. Coyle MJ, Main B, Godden D. Re: Patients’ experience of temporary tracheostomy after microvascular reconstruction for cancer of the head and neck. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2017 Jun 1;55(5):568.
  14. Coyle MJ, Shrimpton A, Perkins C, Fasanmade A, Godden D. First do no harm: should routine tracheostomy after oral and maxillofacial oncological operations be abandoned?. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2012 Dec 1;50(8):732-735.
  15. Bergler W, Maleck W, Baker-Schreyer A, Ungemach J, Petroianu G, Hörmann K. The Mallampati Score. Prediction of difficult intubation in otolaryngologic laser surgery by Mallampati Score. Der Anaesthesist. 1997 May;46(5): 437-440.
  16. Coyle MJ, Tyrrell R, Godden A, Hughes CW, Perkins C, Thomas S, Godden D. Replacing tracheostomy with overnight intubation to manage the airway in head and neck oncology patients: towards an improved recovery. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2013 Sep 1;51(6): 493-496.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.