World Journal of Dentistry

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  13 (2022)
Volume  12 (2021)
Volume  11 (2020)
Volume  10 (2019)
Volume  9 (2018)
Volume  8 (2017)
Volume  7 (2016)
Volume  6 (2015)
Volume  5 (2014)
Volume  4 (2013)
Volume  3 (2012)
Volume  2 (2011)
Volume  1 (2010)
Related articles

VOLUME 1 , ISSUE 2 ( July-September, 2010 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Mercury Vapor Release from Amalgam Restorations: An In Vitro Study

Girija Sajjan, Pradeep N Tavane, Deepak Mehta

Citation Information : Sajjan G, Tavane PN, Mehta D. Mercury Vapor Release from Amalgam Restorations: An In Vitro Study. World J Dent 2010; 1 (2):79-84.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1016

Published Online: 01-09-2010

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2010; The Author(s).


Abstract

Dental amalgam has served as an excellent and versatile restorative material for more than 150 years despite periods of controversies. If we were to believe the opinions of some of the last decade, dental amalgam would not survive as a restorative material into the 21st century. Various forces at work seemed to doom it to extinction.

The aim of the present study is to further characterize the factors that contribute to elemental mercury vapor exposure and to recommend how the practicing dentist can best minimize exposure in the practice setting.

PDF Share
  1. Mercury release from amalgam: A study in vitro and in vivo Oper Dent 1990;15:207-18.
  2. An in vitro investigation of variables influencing mercury vapor release from dental amalgam. Oper Dent 2002;27:73-80.
  3. Mercury release from dental amalgam: An in vitro study under controlled chewing and brushing in an artificial mouth. J Dent Res 1995;74(5): 1185-93.
  4. Mercury exposure from amalgam fillings: Absorbed dose and potential for adverse health effects. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997 in press.
  5. Determination of the rate of release of intraoral mercury vapor from amalgam. J Dent Res 1988;67:1235-42.
  6. Mercury vapor release from dental amalgam in-patients with symptoms allegedly caused by amalgam fillings. Eur J Oral Sci 1006;104:56-63.
  7. Mercury toxicity in dental office: A neglect problem. J Am Dent Assoc 1976;92:1189-94.
  8. Factors contributing to mercury exposure in dentists. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:1502-11.
  9. Investigation of two mercury vapor collection techniques. Dent Mater 1999;15(6):375-81.
  10. Exhaled mercury following removal and insertion of amalgam restoration. Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1983;49:652-56.
  11. J Dent Res 1992;71:414-23.
  12. The effect of dental amalgams on mercury in the impaired air. J Dent Res 1981;60:1668-71.
  13. Amalgam in the new millennium. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:1547-55.
  14. The amalgam controversy. Quintessence int 1991;22:247-48.
  15. Danger of mercury. J Am Dent Assoc 1971;87:1599.
  16. Amalgam fact and fiction. Scan J Dent Res 1992;100: 66-73.
  17. Mercury in the structure of dental amalgam. Dent Mater 1987;3:1-8.
  18. Dental amalgam: Environmental aspects. Adv Dent Res 1992;6:125-30.
  19. Research into nonmercury containing metallic alternatives. Oper Dent Supplement 2001;6:111-18.
  20. Mercury exposure hazards and risk assessment. B Dent J 1997;182:373-81.
  21. Mercury in urine, blood and body organs from amalgam fillings. B Dent J 1997;182:413-17.
  22. Possible harmful effects of mercury from dental amalgam. B Dent J 1997;182:455-59.
  23. Effectiveness of oxide films in reducing mercury release from amalgams. J Dent Res 1992; 77(5):1151-55.
  24. Mercury vapor exposure: A study of dental students. B Dent J 2001;191:449-52.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience.

By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.